Thanks, I'll work through your example. I'm not sure that I follow your second comment. I understand that having duplicate markup is not desirable, but is there another way I should be approaching this?
On Feb 27, 9:35 pm, Maurício Linhares <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's how it could look like ->http://pastie.org/402767 > > And having five pages with almost the same markup is always wrong, you > don't even need to be looking for DRYing up your code. > > - > Maurício Linhareshttp://alinhavado.wordpress.com/(pt-br) > |http://blog.codevader.com/(en) > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:20 AM, ericindc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm working on fixing up the code in my first Rails application and > > have come around to DRYing up the views and partials. For the most > > part, I'm satisfied with the DRYness of the application, but I have > > 5-6 partials that display nearly identical XHTML, just with different > > content, link_to paths, and images. > > > I know this question is entirely subjective, but would finding a way > > to further DRY the 5-6 partials into one partial with plugs for > > different fillers be too much? If so, how would I go about doing > > this? > > > 2 examples... > > >http://pastie.org/402754 > >http://pastie.org/402756 > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
