Well, in my experience there are probably three ways to go: apache + passenger* apache + mongrel/thin nginx + mongrel/thin
Personally, I run with just apache + passenger from this point forward. It has done everything I need, and has had zero downtime due to the configuration, and more due to my idiotic way of handling airflow inside the server case. On Mar 17, 9:40 pm, Joshua Partogi <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > What is the best architecture in terms of performance for Rails. Is > lighttpd + mongrel the most recommended deployment architecture for > Rails? Or is there any better architecture that outperform this > architecture? > > Thank you very much in advance. > > -- > If you can't believe in God the chances are your God is too small. > > Read my blog:http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/ > Follow me on twitter:http://twitter.com/jpartogi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
