After reading more posts Rails is something that I will investigate
fully. Thank you for your good help.

On Apr 1, 9:00 am, Agustin Nicolas Viñao Laseras
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I work in drupal, drupal is very hard to change after a deploy. Develop in
> Drupal is very tedious, complicated every step in an running application.
> Rails is very flexible and if the application is well developed, it is
> easier to make changes and if they did the test, you can change something
> and see that the behavior is expected.
>
> I don't recomended Drupal for a web.
>
> Agustin Viñaowww.agustinvinao.com
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Julian Leviston <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > That seems way too cheap, without knowing a real spec. Is the drupal
> > solution coded with tests inbuilt? Properly coded rails is a lot more
> > maintainable, but you'd be better researching developers no matter the
> > language.
>
> > Blog:http://random8.zenunit.com/
> > Learn rails:http://sensei.zenunit.com/
>
> > On 01/04/2009, at 10:40 AM, george <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi guys,
>
> > > I have gotten quotes with several drupal devs and wanted to compare
> > > this with ruby on rails.
>
> > > Between the range of $2500-5000 can I have a custom site created in
> > > ruby, similar fashion to those of other video sites (except no public
> > > video uploads) that can work in conjunction with quicktime streaming
> > > server? The site would start with "web pages" imported from
> > > spreadsheet files (500+) with all data and some media references such
> > > as links, QT video links, etc. Media pages would be added using
> > > scripts and meta data on a daily basis, perhaps in conjunction with
> > > podcast server for mac os x. Video galleries, multiple galleries based
> > > on speaker or subject, web pages that represent groupings of speakers,
> > > pages for subjects cross referenced by speaker.
>
> > > How would this compare with Drupal in terms of expandability,
> > > reliability, speed, backup and other issues for a popular site with an
> > > engaged interactive user base that actively requests improvements?
>
> > > This is a serious inquiry, please help me explore this solution.
>
> > > Best,
> > > George
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to