Carlos Santana wrote: > However, there is significant difference between code coverage shown by > rake test:test:rcov and rake test:units:rcov. The later one seems to be > more accurate though.
I can't tell from your posts if all the tests run! Coverage is an advanced topic, and it's utterly irrelevant if you have a broken build. Do you still have any symptoms to report? I have never used rcov (and my test to code ratio is usually 2:1), so I feel compelled to recommend you get on rcov's mailing list for specific questions about it. A thinking-out-of-the-box suggestion; can you manually identify lines of code, or branches, that are not tested? That research would help you out with rcov's mission statement - better coverage! -- Phlip --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
