Brandon Olivares wrote:
> Is there any plan to allow for negative assertions (e.g., should_not
> be_html_with)? I use this in a custom matcher, and can't think of a way to
> support negative assertions unless be_html_with does.
I can't think of a reason not to use .should be_html_with{ without!{ ...} }
And it seems that .should_not be_html_with() would, in theory, pass if a page
weren't HTML...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
