On Friday 17 April 2009, Tim Uckun wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Harold A. Giménez Ch. < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > What DBMS are you using? The alternative is a "materialized view". > > postgres.
Have a look at http://github.com/aeden/rails_sql_views/tree/master and my heavily hacked version http://github.com/mschuerig/rails_sql_views/tree/master My version works with Rails 2.3.2, loads only the adapters that are really needed, and adds ActiveRecord::View as an abstract superclass for views that are mostly based on another model. AR::View can clone association definitions from the model to the view, although I haven't implemented all kinds yet. The existing functionality works on PostgreSQL, regarding the others, I'm not sure right now. Michael -- Michael Schuerig mailto:[email protected] http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
