"Some other points you might want to check if you compare these two: - Behavior under concurrent accesses: Transactional isolation, locking. - Transactional changes to the DB structure. - Performance with many joins. - Changing the structure of (large) existing tables.
In my experience, PostgreSQL is better in all of these." Me too. -- Robert Anderson Nogueira de Oliveira _________________________ Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Sergipe Graduando em Sistemas de Informação - UNIT MSN: [email protected] "Ausência de evidência não é evidência de ausência." (Carl Sagan) On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Michael Schuerig <[email protected]>wrote: > Some other points you might want to check if you compare these two: > > - Behavior under concurrent accesses: Transactional isolation, locking. > - Transactional changes to the DB structure. > - Performance with many joins. > - Changing the structure of (large) existing tables. > > In my experience, PostgreSQL is better in all of these. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
