Frederick Cheung wrote:
>> Unless the specs for how to write a session store have changed in 2.3,
>> it may be my code doesn't need to be different for 2.3. But if it does,
>> I can deal with that too.
>>
> They did - had to rewrite a lot of that bit of my session store for
> 2.3
> 

Thanks Fred. It actually looks like this would be fairly straightforward 
in 2.3. This blog post provides some hints:

http://devblog.michaelgalero.com/2009/02/03/guide-to-rails-metal/

But my app is not yet working with 2.3 in general, and I'd like it to 
work with both. And in pre-2.3, it seems, from looking at the Rails 
source, that it would be REALLY tricky to do this.

So now I'm thinking of another option. One would be storing this 
information in my own database models, keyed by Rails SessionID.  But 
once I've done that, I've kind of duplicated the ActiveRecordStore. So 
another option would be writing my code to assume that the session store 
is an ActiveRecordStore -- if you make this assumption, instead of 
trying to write store-agnostic code, then accessing the info in pre-2.3 
looks to be more do-able.  And I could write code that works with either 
pre 2.3 or 2.3.

Not sure what I'm going to do really. I need something keyed on 
sessionID that is accessible outside a Rails request, as well as inside 
a Rails request.

If anyone else has ideas, feel free to share.

Jonathan
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to