I've been thinking about my previous post and have concluded I owe you an apology for exactly the crime I accused you of: presumption. You'll see I presumed upon your motive for posting, which may have just been humour rather than a snide remark. Looks like I;m the immature juve after all.
So sorry for that. On 2 May, 15:10, 7stud -- <[email protected]> wrote: > unknown wrote: > > >> Ahh, I see. "Judge, I did not violate that person's copyright--all I > >> did was copy it for viewing at a later date." lol. > > > The site from which this will happen has explicit permission for > > copying of images. > > > If you had taken my word for it instead of presuming I would not be > > posting this message. > > > Presumption is the sign of a person who has not reached maturity but > > presumption in the face of a person's word is absurd. > > lol. > > A web page is not allowed to sniff around on a user's computer and look > for material to blackmail them with, e.g. a priest with 100,000 images > of naked children in his browser's cache. > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
