Brendon Whateley wrote: > ActiveScaffold brings with it a lot of magic. If you do everything > and name everything the way it wants, all is good.
It does want helper methods named a certain way, but so what? > Otherwise, If you > have model names or table names that don't follow the way it works, > you will have to change your code or be in for a lot of hurt. Um...no. Not as far as I can tell. Granted, I haven't used ActiveScaffold that much, but I don't recall any restrictions -- beyond those imposed by Rails -- on what your models or tables may be called. > > By the time you are up to 100k rows, you may well want to create your > own helpers and use prototype or jQuery code to make the table behave > exactly the way you want. What does the number of rows have to do with it? AS isn't perfect for everything, but it does support exactly what you're describing AFAIK. And since the OP was asking about substitutes for Rails' scaffolding, it seemed like the best thing to suggest. Do you know of something better? > > Brendon. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
