Bharat Ruparel wrote: > "Cheap-but-brittle way: Make the change to the CSS and get on with > it. > That's what I do and I believe it's pretty common practice. When you > upgrade versions, it's brittle, shatters into a million pieces, but > it's easy to spot. " >
I don't remember: will <base href> affect URLs in CSS? I think not, but it might be worth a try. > Thank you. I will go with this route, already have. I can see that > Mr. Yahuda Katz has his work cut out for him for Rails 3.0. After > all, he is the jQuery man :) I hope he makes jQuery a first class > Rails citizen instead of the rather unwelcome guest which it currently > is in Rails world. I've never used jQuery, but it seems to me that this would be a serious problem with the framework. I don't think a general-purpose JS framework should have hard-coded image URLs in its stylesheets -- that's just way too brittle, for exactly the reasons you're running into. I've been thinking about playing with jQuery, but this seems like such a bad idea that I wonder if I should even touch the framework! Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
