Hi- Could tell me how you replaced it? I just installed the newest gem 1.7.2 and would like to use it with rails. What's the procedure to remove the bundled gem? Thanks. Erik
On Apr 8, 8:14 pm, Ryan Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > It turned out that the bundled memcache client that came with > ActiveSupport (1.6.5) was, for some reason, _much_ slower than the one > we were using before the Rails 2.3 upgrade (we were using fiveruns- > memcache-client (1.5.0.5), the one that has retries built in). > > We've replaced the bundled memcache client with our old one, and it > performs much better. > > On Apr 8, 1:52 pm, Clinton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > After much effort I upgraded our fairly large Rails app from 2.1 to > > 2.3. After deployment yesterday I noticed an across the board > > increase in response times. It seems that every call to memcache now > > takes 10x longer than before. Here are some example numbers from my > > development log (below), with memcache running locally. We see > > similar scale of performance drop in production as well - average > > memcache call before 2ms, now 20ms. It adds up to a significant hit. > > > Before Rails 2.3 upgrade: > > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_recent_blog_posts (0.00043) > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_active_threads (0.00033) > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_weekly_feature (0.00029) > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_recent_approved_items (0.00036) > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_popular_items (0.00037) > > Cached fragment hit: views/number_of_members (0.00032) > > > After Rails 2.3 upgrade: > > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_recent_blog_posts (3.2ms) > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_active_threads (3.5ms) > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_weekly_feature (2.9ms) > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_recent_approved_items (2.8ms) > > Cached fragment hit: views/homepage_popular_items (3.1ms) > > Cached fragment hit: views/number_of_members (6.7ms) > > > Before I start delving into the memcache internals in Rails 2.3, has > > anyone else experienced this degradation on their apps? Is there a > > magic 'make it fast again' switch that I can flick? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
