SpringFlowers AutumnMoon wrote: [...] > hm... so the XHTML will just be used as html...
Not really; the DOCTYPE still tells the browser that it's XHTML. and we aim to output it > as XHTML anyway... > > pragmatically, it will work... i just wonder why we don't just output > what is really being accepted by most browsers. Most browsers have no problem. IE is the exception, sort of. Anyway, XHTML is a cleaner standard than HTML -- since it's 100% well-formed XML, it's easier to parse and more extensible. There is absolutely no reason *not* to use XHTML for all your output. You are creating a problem out of thin air. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
