On 27 May 2009, at 14:47, Rimantas Liubertas wrote: >> This is a fairly retarded argument. Rails produces an XHTML >> transitional doctype, so it's all irrelevant. > > Did you read? Doctypes are relevant only for rendering modes > swithcing (quirks/standards), not for parsing engines (html/xml) > switching. > >> If you want your own doctype, then type it in. It's not hard. > > Oh thanks, this idea never occured to me. > Now the next part—how do I tell rails to stop polluting my code > with "/>"?
http://github.com/jonleighton/html_output/tree/master Best regards Peter De Berdt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
