Screen is valuable because you can start a session and then detach for
any period of time and then resume.

I've written about screen here:

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-gnu_screen/


On May 27, 12:35 pm, Philip Hallstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I hear a lot say GNU Screen is better than Terminal's tabs.
>
> > But I cannot find a real use case. I can understand that ability
> > to copy and paste is useful.
>
> > But in terms of session attaching/detaching, all the sessions
> > are gone if I restart my Mac.
>
> > I'm using Terminal with several tabs open (e.g., tail -f  
> > development.log,
> > script/console, irb...)
>
> > I can use Command-Shift-] to move between tabs, but in
> > GNU Screen, I need to type Control-A n. To me, the latter
> > is more memorable and Mac-like.
>
> > I mostly develop locally and push the app to the server.
> > I never felt the need to sharing the session in GNU Screen.
>
> > I think I'm wrong in somewhere because a lot of people prefer
> > GNU Screen.
>
> > Can anybody explain the usefulness and what's wrong in my view?
>
> I don't think you're doing anything wrong... screen loses a lot of  
> it's usefulness when used locally.  That said, I still use it on my  
> mac for a couple of reasons:
>
> - When I started Terminal didn't support tabs.  I hate having a ton of  
> windows open.
> - I use iTerm and even then don't like having a bunch of tabs open :)
>
> What I like about using screen is I've got an alias setup to read  
> a .screenrc file specifically for rails (http://pastefree.pjkh.com/pastes/55
> ).  This sets up 8 windows within screen and names them: controllers,  
> views, models, dbconsole, console, misc, javascripts, stylesheets,  
> server.  The last one runs ./script/server.  All the others do what  
> they are named.  It makes jumping around quite nice.  You'll see in  
> the screenrc I don't like CTRL-A so have remapped it to CTRL-].  That  
> doesn't get in the way of vim as much.  Yeah, I know there are plugins  
> to vim to make it more project like, but I've gotten too used to this  
> to change :)
>
> What I find useful about running it all locally via screen is that I  
> can start up a project with "railsscreen foo" and work on it.  Then  
> detach it, and start up "railscreen bar" and work on that for awhile.  
> Then detach and reattach to foo and work on that.  I hardly ever shut  
> off my mac so keeping this up and open is convenient.  Also I  
> sometimes get a little happy with the CMD-Q combo and find I've quit  
> iTerm.  But it doesn't matter as screen lives on.
>
> If you do end up using screen, on a mac, with vim, and iTerm you might  
> find this useful for getting 256 color 
> support.http://pjkh.com/articles/2008/07/09/osx-iterm-screen-vim-256-colors
>
> -philip
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to