Michael Schuerig wrote: > On Thursday 28 May 2009, Jeff Schwab wrote: >> Phlip wrote: >>> Railsters: >>> >>> I heard a rumor that the incorrect answer, "Controller", was in >>> circulation out there. >> That's how I was taught MVC, long before I'd heard of Ruby: Models >> do some basic checking, but business logic belongs in the controller. >> That was the point of the controller; it gave a central place to put >> business logic. > > That sounds more like Jacobson's Entity-Boundary-Control. Is there a > chance you're thinking of that?
No, what I'm describing was a dominant view of MVC in the late 90's. Of course, that doesn't make it right, and maybe it should have been called Entity-Boundary-Control. Thanks for giving me something to Google. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
