So...then...how is this different than running jruby under mongrel ?
On Jun 4, 10:05 pm, JannaB <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, in effect, it is more like running under tomcat, without having to
> make a war file and all that java-nonsense -- and since I am running
> in JRuby, I get the full power of that.
>
> On Jun 4, 10:00 pm, Maurício Linhares <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Not exactly.
>
> > The Http connector (which is the really important part) is the same
> > Grizzly NIO connector that goes inside the full fledged Glassfish, but
> > this is a lite version with most of the Java EE garbage striped out.
> > You wouldn't need it anyway in a Rails application, no reason to keep
> > it.
>
> > In Java parlance it's simple servlet container.
>
> > -
> > Maurício Linhareshttp://alinhavado.wordpress.com/(pt-br)
> > |http://blog.codevader.com/(en)
>
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:56 PM, JannaB <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > This is cool. No repackaging -- and if I am correct, when running in
> > > glassfish (on Windows systems, jruby -S glassfish ) I am running in a
> > > true J2EE application server every bit as powerful as, say JBoss?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
