Doug Jolley wrote:
> My concern is
> that when something goes wrong it could compound the difficulty of
> locating the problem.

I've never had this be an issue at all!

>  It's difficult enough trying to locate typos in
> variable names in interpreted languages 

(Nitpick: this has nothing to do with Ruby being interpreted. 
Interpreted languages can require variable declarations, while compiled 
ones need not necessarily.)

> without having the language
> introduce its own variations on spelling.  

Actually, it's the framework doing that...but again, the whole thing is 
pretty transparent if you speak English and know Ruby's capitalization 
rules.

> But, the whole thing is
> neither here nor there.  That's the way it is.  There is no way to
> disable that "feature"; and so, I have to live with it. 

Perhaps you shouldn't be using Rails if this really bothers you.  Rails 
is a great framework, but it does a great deal of magic -- almost too 
much.  There are other Ruby Web frameworks such as Merb and Ramaze that 
may be more to your taste.

Personally, I like the Rails inflections.  They work by well-defined 
rules, and knowing what's what has never been a problem for me in 
practice.

> Thanks for
> the input.
> 
>            ... doug

You're welcome!

Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
[email protected]
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to