ZhayTee wrote:

> Unfortunately, Rails itself fails to function. Running the "rails"
> script fails with the following error:
> 
> <internal:gem_prelude>:234:in `push_gem_version_on_load_path': Could
> not find RubyGem activesupport (>= 0) (Gem::LoadError)

I installed Rails 2.3.2 and Ruby 1.9.1 (from source) with no problem on 
Ubuntu Hardy. I guess I was too cocky, because I get the error you 
describe after building ruby 1.9.1p129 from source and installing Rails 
2.3.2 on my shiny new iMac running Leopard. Some gems are fine, e.g.,

irb(main):002:0> require 'haml'
=> true

but some of the Rails gems, or things that depend on them, conk out in 
the way you describe. I checked my GEM_PATH, and everything is where 
Ruby should be looking. Would love to hear suggestions.

> Is Rails 2.3.2 simply not compatible with 1.9.1, despite what the
> release notes say? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

They are running great on my Ubuntu VPS and netbook. Gems are another 
story, especially some of the database adapters. You'll to need to poke 
around for forks people have hacked together to get those working.

Steve
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to