Frederick Cheung wrote:
> On Jul 5, 12:04�pm, Onur Gungor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Would it be OK to create a model and its corresponding table for just
>> locking? i.e. Lock model and locks table.
> 
> That or rails' optimistic locking might be useful. I would usually shy
> away from creating a Lock model, it just seems a bit artificial. I
> would probably stick a locked_by_foo column on the appropriate model
> and use that to tell whether a particular object is being updated (and
> use optimistic locking in conjunction with that)
> 
> Fred

Thanks for your response,

But as I told in my post replying Marnen, I just don't know which 
objects to lock (or because there are several of them).

So I will use the Lock model approach for now.

Thanks for all your answers, Best
Onur
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to