InventoryTrackers wrote: > I am hoping to add a more practical view to this thread.
Nothing you've said is "more practical". > I too, have > read the reams of postings about how Capistrano is the ONLY way to go. No one is saying it's the *only* way to go, just that it has lots of advantages. > I have found that a simple subversion approach is easiest. I simply go > to where my application is loaded on my server and enter = svn update > That's it and it sure makes it easy. Sounds like you haven't even tried Capistrano, or you'd know that deployment with Cap is *even easier* than your method: no need to explicitly log into the server, just enter "cap deploy" from the dev machine and voilà. One command does it all. Besides, many applications have other things that need to be done on deployment. Cap automates this. (Oh, and you really should try switching to Git. Subversion is *extremely* limited by comparison). > David Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
