I use (and like) FusionCharts, but I am only developing internal applications so I can control/require what is on my users desktops.
If you have a graphing requirement for the mobile browser version (which you may not even have - don't know what your application is), then the Flash requirement will be an issue. If you only need to provide graphs for a desktop version, then I don't think requiring Flash is a major issue. Eric On Jul 13, 8:58 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser <rails-mailing-l...@andreas- s.net> wrote: > Janna Brossard wrote: > > But frankly, it really appears to me that fusion charts is the best > > looking. Am I mistaken? Do you guys see a better open source solution? > > I would urge you not to use Fusion Charts. For simple images like > charts, there is no need to require your users to install Flash (which > is not possible on most mobile browsers, for example). I suggest > something that uses simple images like Google Charts or Gruff; the > SIMILE project may also have some useful stuff. > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org > [email protected] > > > -Janna B > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
