Pål Bergström wrote: > What I like about git is > branching. Likewise.
> But for actual version control I can manage without it. I've > used git for a while now and I've never needed to use it for going back > in code. Trust me. :-) You've never had a branch that you wanted to back out of? You've never wanted to not deploy the bleeding-edge version of your codebase until it stabilizes? > >> Getting back to the topic, do you understand now how to get Cap >> deployment working? It's really not terribly difficult if you trust >> Capistrano to do the right thing in most cases. > > Not quite. I don't think is that clear. What don't you understand? [...] > And sometimes we users are just thick headed. :-) Sure sounds like it. Give it a try and let me know if you have any actual problems. > > So back to my question, what if I, as I would like that way, have zero > and nada interest of having version control on the server side? Then you will not get much sympathy from me, nor from many others on this list, as you are asking for help in implementing a Certified Bad Idea [TM]. It can be done, but I do not recommend it. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
