Thanks for answering Vikrant, Did render change recently, because the internet is littered with advice saying
render :controller => 'con_name', :action => 'action_name' is valid syntax. And if you can say render 'controller/action', why not allow it to be stated the other way too? Tim On Jul 26, 10:11 pm, Vikrant <[email protected]> wrote: > Argument to the "render()" method does not recognises the > ":controller" key. You might be confusing it with arguments to > "redirect_to()" method. > Checkouthttp://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionController/Base.html#M000658 > for more information. > > On Jul 27, 9:49 am, Tim Rand <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi,From within an action called manager within a controller called > > storedorders, I want to render to the view for the manger action of > > controller orders. > > > It really seems like the following syntax should work: > > > (within the StoredordersController manager method...) > > > respond_to do |format| > > format.html {render :controller => 'orders', :action => 'manager'} > > # format.xml { head :ok } > > end > > > But I get the following message: > > > "Template is missing > > Missing template storedorders/manager.erb in view path app/views" > > > Why is it even looking when I told it to render a different view? > > > This however works: > > respond_to do |format| > > format.html {render 'orders/manager'} > > # format.xml { head :ok } > > end > > > It really seems like either syntax should be valid. What am I missing? > > Thanks, > > Tim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
