Passenger uses mongrel? Is that really true? I have no idea but on the modrails.com site it lists Passenger as being faster than mongrel while running a couple apps. I'd almost have to say this isn't true, if not because of the performance difference, then because it shares none of the configuration settings of Mongrel. If those files are sitting around they are cleverly hidden.
On Jul 30, 1:48 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser <rails-mailing-l...@andreas- s.net> wrote: > Total shot in the dark: resource acquisition deadlock? I seem to recall > that Passenger runs a cluter of Mongrels, while I assume you're only > running one Webrick process at a time... > > I could be totally off base here, though. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
