Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Paolo Montrasio wrote: > [...] >> However if a legitimate user tries to access your service with two >> browsers at the same time, s/he'll may end up a little upset. > > Yes, this is one of the frustrating scenarios I was thinking of -- and > of course there are plenty of legitimate reasons to do so.
All I have to contribute is this: Once I found out that a service that might interest me was going through this much trouble to prevent users from "sharing" an account would definitely make me lose interest immediately. Not that I would want to share the account, but I would decline on principal. If you don't trust me then I don't want anything to do with your service. Just create a clear terms of service agreement, which allows me to decide wether to sign up or not. That's how the big guys do it, and it tends to work out pretty well. I also agree that if the site has compelling reasons to sign up, then I'd want to have my own account anyway. Just some food for thought. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
