AlwaysCharging wrote: > Since a couple versions have been released since the Simply Rails > book, should I revert back to an earlier version of rails to better > follow the book?
Absolutely not. If no version of Simply Rails is available for 2.3 (the current stable version), then don't use Simply Rails. > I'm what you'd call a super noob, and I'd rather > make it as easy as possible on myself while I follow the book. I > think it uses rails 2.0, should I revert back to that to better learn > the concepts? and then switch back and learn the differences? No. Don't start learning on a version that's already obsolete for new development. > > It seems like a very well designed book and I'm trying to make my > first foray into rails (and programming for that matter) as easy as > possible. There are many well-designed books that work with the current version of Rails. Use one. > If I do stay with rails 2.3.3 would I incur very many > problems? Probably not, but why make life more difficult as you learn? > > Any help/insight is greatly appreciated. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
