On Aug 16, 2009, at 4:18 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > I would say native multi-threading is a huge plus for Jruby as well. Why do you say this? Most request/response cycles are so quick that they are unlikely to benefit significantly from multithreading. How "huge" a win is multi-threading in the timespan of ... say ... < 30ms? > For image processing I believe image-vodoo has been had with much > success in the Jruby world (as well as attachment_fu and rmagick) > > One negative for Jruby is if you want to use a gem with a native-C > only extension then you are out of luck, but most so far I have seen > have had C and Jave implementations of the gem. > > AD > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Hassan > Schroeder<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 7:29 AM, >> InventoryTrackers<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> My two cents. >>> None of the RMagick stuff with attachment_fu would work when I tried >>> to use JRuby. They said they had something like JMagick? but >>> nobody I >>> contacted seemed to use photos in their application??? >> >> FWIW, ImageMagick with the mini_magick gem works fine with JRuby >> (using attachment_fu). >> >> -- >> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ [email protected] >> twitter: @hassan >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
