Wouldn't it just be controller_additional_function_path? You can check by running rake routes
On Aug 26, 11:08 pm, Dhruva Sagar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I am developing a small web application using rails, in my controller I have > added a function which is apart from the normal one's that are supported by > the default routes, hence to map this one as well I have the following route > : > > map.resources :controller, :collection => { :additional_function => :get } > > Now I am able to access this method just as I should, but I just wanted to > know if there is some dynamic path construct that I can use for this method > in my views. > > To make my question more clear, eg.) if I have to use the path to the 'new' > action I would use this : new_controller_path > So what I want to know is if there is such a dynamic variable that I can use > for the additional function that I declared, or do I always have to hard > code it using a string ? > > Thanks & Regards, > Dhruva Sagar. > > Marie von > Ebner-Eschenbach<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/marie_von_ebnereschenbac....> > - "Even a stopped clock is right twice a day." --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
