Hi. I can't be the only one in the world having the wonderful idea to have a resource named "image".
I have a controller named images_controller I have a route named "image", and therefore a helper called image_path(id). But using image_path in an action view erb file gives problems, there another helper named image_path[1] is defined, hence I can no longer use the named route url helper image_path For now I have changed my routes.rb from map.resources :images to map.resources :images, :singular => "my_image", Then I can use my_image_path in action views. But... Isn't image such a common word for a resource that [1] should have a different name, e.g. asset_path, image_asset_path, or something else. There is already an alias path_to_image[1]. How about just stick to that? What do you say? There are some others having this problem: [2] Jarl Footnotes: [1] http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/AssetTagHelper.html#M001720 [2] http://forums.pragprog.com/forums/59/topics/2723 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
