On Aug 30, 8:54 am, Rick <[email protected]> wrote: > So I haven't read too much about the snow leopard changes but is it > possible that the executable format (or dynamic link format) has > changed? Why would everything stop working?
For the 64-bit installs of SL, yes. Not the executable format so much as the instruction format and addressing. This is the first major kernel upgrade ... maybe since OSX came out. You'll have to do some rebuilding. I took a scorched-earth approach and: - Noted which gems I have installed - Wiped out MacPorts completely - Rebuilt mysql - Rebuilt Ruby 1.8.7 (Rails 3 will need this as a minimum) - Rebuilt Ruby 1.9 - Reinstalled rubygems - Installed gems in priority order. I'm waiting for stuff to break before littering my system with unnecessary gems Note that because my Mac is a Macbook Pro, I don't have any 64-bitness to worry about. > > On Aug 30, 10:24 am, Rick DeNatale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Rick<[email protected]> wrote: > > > Related to snow leopard, does XCode still come with the OSX > > > distribution? > > > Yes, it's on the disk. And easer to find than it was on the Leopard > > (or maybe it was Tiger) where the additional installs folder was > > scrolled off the finder view. > > > -- > > Rick DeNatale > > > Blog:http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ > > Twitter:http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale > > WWR:http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale > > LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
