Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Jeff Pritchard wrote:
> [...]
>> Thanks Steve, this is useful and interesting info.
> 
> If you'd like another data point, I completely agree with Steve. Haml is 
> wonderful, and Sass is to ny knowledge the *only* tool that makes it 
> feasible to make CSS truly semantic and free of presentation classes.  I 
> can't imagine doing without them again.
> 
>> 
>> Just to clarify, my "side to side" analogy was intended to convey that 
>> some new tools did nothing to improve the Rails toolset -- some new 
>> tools moved app development sideways rather than forward.  There have 
>> been plenty of "best thing since sliced bread" new ways to do things 
>> with Rails that have turned out to be just a distraction and which, in 
>> my view, were not an improvement over the "old way", and which have 
>> since faded away (apparently others agreed).  
> 
> There's always some of that in any evolving technology.
> 
>> Sadly, some of those 
>> "bright ideas" were adopted by the Rails team, so we're stuck with those 
>> (like REST).
> 
> REST is a big step forward, so this is probably an inapt example...
> 
>> 
>> Thanks for the info on HAML and Compass
>> jp
> 
> Best,
> --
> Marnen Laibow-Koser
> http://www.marnen.org
> [email protected]


Thanks Marnen.  I've been studying HAML and SASS and Compass over the 
weekend, and I think I'm convinced.  I'm going to do my next project 
with them and see how it goes.

>> Sadly, some of those 
>> "bright ideas" were adopted by the Rails team, so we're stuck with those 
>> (like REST).
> 
> REST is a big step forward, so this is probably an inapt example...

THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES!   :)
(I know there are plenty of otherwise intelligent people who like it, 
but in my opinion, REST is dumb if you're not writing a web service - I 
see no advantage at all for a normal web application - and my feeble old 
brain refuses to be able to remember the darn path names - much easier 
to just use a hash of controller/action - and none of my clients is ever 
willing to allow a UI organization that is just straight-forward CRUD, 
always need custom actions, and the 'standard' crud just winds up as 
dead code )


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to