I'm not an SEO expert, but I am about 99% sure if you switch from the 
.html to non-.html URLs, you are going to want to have permanent 
redirects in place or your ranking is going to take a hit for a while 
(not to mention users who have bookmarks, other sites with links to you, 
etc).

dwh


Confused about Rails wrote:
> Appreciate the mod_rewrite suggestions. That will clearly solve the
> problem of the broken inbound links.
>
> However, I need to do some more research on what Google counts as an
> inbound link. The Google page ranking may just want to see what its
> always seen i.e. <site name>/<page name>.html or the ranking software
> may be clever enough to figure out that pollenceramics.com/artist
> still works and is accepted as an inbound link.
>
> I certainly take the point that its much better to follow the rails
> convention of <site name>/<page name> and forget the .html.
>
>   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to