How is id + version different from number + version? id and number are both auto-incrementing.
I don't see how Java is going to make this problem (with the design) go away. On Sep 9, 10:36 am, adrianopol <[email protected]> wrote: > It is for versioning. I have a pair (number, version) as another > method to identificate a row in the table, so "number" and "id" are > absolutely independent. So, to my mind, more low-level language and > libraries are better in this situation. > > On Sep 9, 9:17 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser <rails-mailing-l...@andreas- > > s.net> wrote: > > adrianopol wrote: > > > Thanks! Frankly speaking, I've decided to use java for this project. > > > It's not good to fight with framework's logic) > > > So learn it instead of fighting with it. Anyway, while I'm surprised > > that Rails migrations can't do what you want here, I also can't see how > > more than one autoincrement field in a table would be useful: if you > > have one, then you can calculate all the others from it. > > > Best, > > -- > > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org > > [email protected] > > -- > > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
