theLemcke wrote: > Is it possible to do this without the use of has_and_belongs_to_many?
Without looking at your case in detail, let me remind you that any habtm can also be represented by an equivalent has_many :through. > > On Sep 16, 3:07�am, Steve Rawlinson <[email protected]> Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
