On 29 Set, 11:50, Frederick Cheung <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 10:43 am, adedip <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 29 Set, 11:38, Frederick Cheung <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 29, 10:18 am, adedip <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > ----
> > > > using @articles = Article.find_all_by_id(@ids)
> > > > It seems to work, I get results, but they're wrong! :S
>
> > > That should work. Does the generated sql look right ?
>
> > > Fred
>
> > nope, it doesn't I get other authors and Dates out of the range
> > the funny thing is that if I pass the array number manually it works!
> > how can I print the @ids variable in the view? just to have a log..
>
> You could use debug. What's wrong with the generated sql? Also, you
> say you are intersecting the relevant finds but you seem to be just
> concatenating them.
> Lastly, given that you already have all the Article objects, why go
> back to the database (ie why not @aut & @range & @search) ?
because I have to do the @search part using acts_as_solr (for studying
purpose)
(I've bound @aut and @range in the se same query now)
>
> Fred
>
>
>
> > (btw I've just realized that I can avoid the two Article.find arrays
> > by extending conditions in only one of them :P)
>
> > > > ----
>
> > > > what's wrong? :S
> > > > Thanks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
