It's not the twitter gem, it's the mash gem.  The twitter gem requires
the mash gem.
Erik

On Oct 6, 6:36 pm, erik <[email protected]> wrote:
> We had something very odd happen today after installing the twitter
> gem.  We had a ton of our tests fail.  When we removed the gem they
> would pass.
>
> What it ended up being was during the building of attributes using
> nested attributes setters we were accessing the hash that was passed
> in like this:
>
> def shade_preference_attributes=(shade_preference_attributes)
>     shade_preference_attributes.each_pair do |key, value|
>       value.each do |shade|
>         self.shade_preferences.build(:shade_id => shade
> [:shade_id], :preference => shade[:preference])
>       end
>     end
>   end
>
> Before installing and configuring the twitter gem in our rails
> application this worked fine.  After doing it, it started failing.
> The failure was because shade (a hash) did not have :shade_id
> or :preference in it anymore.  It actually always had the keys
> "shade_id" and "preference" that never changed, but now the access of
> them by symbol started failing.
>
> When I removed removed the config.gem line for the the twitter gem
> everything worked fine.
>
> I'm assuming this has something to do with indifferent access.  In
> both cases the shade is a normal Hash.  But, in one case it appears to
> be using indifferent access and in another case not.  Or could it be
> the hash was built using indifferent acces or not?  I'm not exactly
> sure how that works.
>
> The twitter gem installs a bunch of gems.  Has anyone seen anything
> like this before.
> Thanks.
> Erik
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to