Teedub wrote: > It seems that I have a choice of > blah.js > blah.rjs > blah.js.rjs > and blah.js.erb > plus I guess blah.rjs.erb (maybe) > > I know that this is somewhat version dependent. > Which is the "bestest"? and is there a difference.
Remember, the template naming format is: action.type.renderer So for blah.html.erb, Rails will use the ERb renderer and serve the result as HTML. Likewise, for blah.js.rjs , Rails will use the RJS renderer and serve the result as JavaScript. blah.js would be a plain JavaScript file that doesn't get processed by Rails, and blah.rjs is the deprecated Rails 1.x way of naming blah.js.rjs. The remaining combinations are left as an exercise to the student. :) > > Thanks in advance. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
