Rick Lloyd wrote: > for MacOS you should look at: http://aquamacs.org/
I have. My recollection is that it's attractive and usable, but didn't seem like any improvement over the console version. It was long enough ago that I don't remember exactly what my issues were. > and load in: > http://rubyforge.org/projects/emacs-rails > > emacs is not a simple learn but you've got to love a an editor that's > > 1) has been available on every os platform since the early 80's > 2) is a historic part of the open software community > 3) is fully extensible, written in C, programmable in elisp > 4) the programmer's hanzo - tool of choice I agree -- emacs is absolutely my console editor of choice. But I don't like using console editors when a GUI editor is available. > > On Oct 29, 5:31�pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser <rails-mailing-l...@andreas- Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
