If you're an IDE type there is no comparison, RubyMine is much better IMO. You don't need a lot of IDE for Rails development, but a good editor with real code completion and intelligent templating huge.
Neither of them provide a decent interface to running rake tasks and rails scripts - it ends up being more a PITA than the command line. 3rdRail got that one right, they have a command line in the IDE with command completion - it's about $99 now too. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christoph Jasinski Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Rails] (annoying) question: Netbeans vs Rubymine Hi, I'm don't want to start another post about what's the best IDE. Am just considering getting a licence for Rubymine which is 99$ I think. But I don't know whether it's really better than Netbeans. My focus is on BDD with cucumber, Rspec and Shoulda. Can anyone tell me his/her experience concering test support in those two IDE's (I'm really reducing the question to two IDE's) BDD should work out of the box. It's somehow 100$ against 0$. But if $100 make's me by far productive than it's worth it. Thanks and sorry if the IDE questions bother you Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
