I suspected that adding with << wouldn't work; does using the build or create method work?
--Matt Jones On Dec 11, 7:26 am, Jarmo Pertman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello. > > Thank you for your suggestion. > > I tried it and it worked for finding, but adding doesn't work > unfortunately. > > Jarmo > > On Dec 9, 5:06 pm, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 8, 10:05 am, Jarmo Pertman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > I'm facing the problem where I have something like this: > > > class Person > > > has_many :things, > > > :conditions => "dynamic conditions depending of the object" > > > end > > > > So, the problem is that i would like to have a dynamic condition which > > > depends upon the object. In my particular case, it is something like > > > this: > > > has_many :things, > > > :conditions => {:country_code => 'country_code_string'} > > > > So, let's say that the country_code_string might be 'UK', 'US' and so > > > on. How can I make this kind of association? > > > On Dec 8, 10:05 am, Jarmo Pertman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > I'm facing the problem where I have something like this: > > > class Person > > > has_many :things, > > > :conditions => "dynamic conditions depending of the object" > > > end > > > > So, the problem is that i would like to have a dynamic condition which > > > depends upon the object. In my particular case, it is something like > > > this: > > > has_many :things, > > > :conditions => {:country_code => 'country_code_string'} > > > I haven't tried this, but you may want to give it a shot. You could > > set up a method on Person that scopes the association: > > > class Person > > has_many :things > > def things_for_country(code) > > things.scoped(:conditions => { :country_code => code }) > > end > > end > > > And then calling it would look like (assume @person is a Person > > object): > > > @person.things_for_country('US') > > > This will certainly work for *finding* records; I'm not 100% sure what > > will happen with building/adding objects - it is likely to work, but > > you should definitely write some tests... > > > Hope this helps! > > > --Matt Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
