But what about new features, won't I miss out on some "cool" new stuff?
On 15 Dec., 21:03, Satyajit Malugu <[email protected]> wrote: > Rails 3.0 is claimed to be fully back ward compatible, so nothing major in > your code would be broken even if you develop in 2.3.5. > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:41 AM, andkjaer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Would it be shear madness to start developing a large scale project > > with the current Rails version, when 3.0 is "just round the corner"? > > > Let me know your takes on that... > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- > Satyajit -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
