Frederick Cheung wrote: > Are you using the app checked in at > http://code.google.com/p/simply-rich-authenticator > essentially unmodified?
YES! >That is using rails 2.0.2 (look at > environment.rb) and rescue_from was only made to deal with > RoutingError in july of 2008 (ie several months after that sample app > was checked in), (if memory is correct that will mean that the first > version it was in was rails 2.2) I tracked through environment.rb with a debugger and RAILS_GEM_VERSION = '2.0.2' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION RAILS_GEM_VERSION is undefined before the statement and is defined as RAILS_GEM_VERSION = "2.0.2" afterwards. I continued the run and immediately got the error - - - F:/InstantRails-2.0-win/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.2.2/lib/initializer. rb:530:in `send': undefined method `cache_template_extensions=' for ActionView:: Base:Class (NoMethodError) - - - So a little sniffing in the debugger and Google found http://paulsturgess.co.uk/articles/show/75-undefined-method-cache_template_extensions-when-upgrading-to-ruby-on-rails-222 Commending out the line # config.action_view.cache_template_extensions = false in application.rb and voila ... rescue_from ActionController::RoutingError, :with => :route_not_found now works. I love you, Frederick Cheung. Please marry me. - - - - Now I have another decision to make. Do I use the autlogic code or the restful authorization code? The http://code.google.com/p/simply-rich-authenticator code does a lot of stuff I want (e.g. email confirmation of the user's email account). Yet ... I am reading a lot about why I should not use it. Some advice, please. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
