On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, Hassan. Normally I respect your posts here very much, but in > this case I think you're coming up with increasingly tenuous > justifications for a very bad design decision. Uh, I'm not trying to "justify" anything. :-) Perhaps what's been lost here is the original question -- how do you use test-data generators like Machinist/Sham when you need an example of *invalid* data, that is, values not in the generated set? It's simple with fixtures, eh, but... Not every failing (TDD/BDD) test will have a solution implemented solely based on adding foreign keys to a DB schema. Or so I imagine. :-) -- Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ [email protected] twitter: @hassan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
