this might be worth a look : 
http://codaset.com/codaset/codaset/blog/create-schema-less-dynamic-model-attributes

On Jan 7, 10:46 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > i guess what i meant to say was that if i created a user-defined
> > column then i (through some magical UI controls which i'd eventually
> > throw together) would like to be able to say is "this column is an
> > integer.." and when i use that new user defined column it gets the
> > full benefits of validates_numericality_of ... user_column_1.. what i
> > was driving at was if i create a serialized column and create pseudo-
> > fields inside of that then theres no way to get baked in validations
> > and i'd end up creating my own validation functions.
>
> Not really true AFAIK.  While I've never done this with serialized
> fields, I don't believe Rails should have much trouble validating on
> virtual or serialized attributes as if they were DB fields.
>
>
>
> > im sure this sort of thing is possible but im thinking its going to be
> > a lot of trouble... hopefully nt more than its worth.
>
> I think you're anticipating more trouble than you'll actually have.
>
> > however, if i can invent a better wheel i'd love to share it with the
> > world... so that kinda urges me to push forward.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Best,
> -- 
> Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org
> [email protected]
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.


Reply via email to