pepe wrote: > I am sorry but I don't have an answer about the RAM question. However > I would like to answer Marnen�s comment. While I agree that letting > the DB do the work for mass record processing should be the best and > most efficient way to go by reading the OP one cannot assume that is > the way things are in this case.
No, but it's likely. > The array used by the OP could very > well contain tons of different types of objects, used for very > different purposes and not necessarily related to each other. Then for the purpose of saving, they should be separated out by type. Queries don't go in loops. Period. > Pierre > never gave any indication it was one way or the other. True. So why "correct" me with an unlikely exception to the general principle? Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
