I have a version of the book with something that looks like a circular stamp on the cover that says "Covers Rails 2.0", so I guess it has been updated. ;)
And I would have to agree with Marnen. It looks like you have a routing issue. Cheers. On Feb 8, 8:16 am, tuti plain <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am not exactly sure what is meant by CoC, Continuity of Code? > > CoC means "convention over configuration", which is supposed to be one > of Rails' founding philosophies. > > > if you are determined to play along with an outdated book that uses an > > outdated version of Rails, you might consider installing and using an > > outdated version of Rails... > > It's not that I'm determined to play with an outdated book, I just > thought, this book was the de facto reference for Rails, but I guess I > might have been wrong about it. > > >Hi Tuti, > >You can still use a empty controller method. > >You just have to name it ie. index.html.erb or index.erb :) > > That is exactly what I had, but it didn't work until I added the > respond_to code. Not that I intend to have empty controller methods, > but I'd still like to know why it didn't function. > > >Rails 2.x is very different from Rails 1.x. Try to find an up-to-date > >book. http://guides.rails.infois also a great place to start. > > I had been on this page before and tried out the first tutorials. > Guess I'll go more in depth. > > Thanks for your replies! > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
