No - I didn't.  I didn't realize we were supposed to do that but I'll start.
 Sorry about that.  I just figured that was a "plugins need to be updated"
issue and not a Rails 3 issue.

-ben

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Conrad Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:17 AM, ben wiseley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I just had to make a similar decision.  In order to get something going
>> quickly I stuck with 2.3.5.  Rails 3 seems great, but most of the plugins I
>> tried had issues so I decided to wait.
>>
>> -ben
>>
>>
> Ben, did you file tickets against each of the plugins and gems that didn't
> work with Rails 3.0?  Also, I would recommend updating the following site:
>
>  http://www.railsplugins.org
>
> -Conrad
>
>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Conrad Taylor <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:43 PM, princezuda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hey,
>>>> I am making a new project, and I've been having trouble deciding
>>>> between rails and 3.5 and rails 3.0.0 beta one.  I realize that rails
>>>> 3.0.0 should be out of beta sometime mid-summer, which is around the
>>>> time I expect to launch a project.  I try to think ahead, and in many
>>>> ways it makes sense to program and 3.0 .0.  Yet the language is full
>>>> of bugs still.  So should I launch with 2.3.5 instead?I could really
>>>> use your feedback and appreciate any opinions and comments.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Ryan
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ryan, you can start development now using Rails 2.3.5 and Ruby 1.9.1
>>> today.  Then
>>> when you're ready to make the leap to Rails 3.0, you can simply make a
>>> Rails
>>> 3.0 branch of your web application.  However, in the meantime, I would
>>> recommend
>>> following the Rails 3.0 threads, release notes, and blogs posts to remain
>>> current.
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>>
>>> -Conrad
>>>
>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to