Thanks for your response Jeremy,

Here's what I know now. With http://localhost:3000/ and the 2nd line
of routes.db successively:
   map.root :controller => "vendors"    # undefined method
`vendor_path'
   map.root :controller => "users"      # Works
   map.resources :users                         # No route matches "/" with 
{:method=>:get}
   map.resources :vendors                       # No route matches "/" with
{:method=>:get}

Also, the following both work, seemingly regardless of what routes are
available
    http://localhost:3000/users
    http://localhost:3000/vendors

My next effort is to add a Home page with a side-bar of links to other
pages and kill all the root/resource entries except Home itself as the
default.

Yet I wonder why controller => "vendors" fails despite the fact that
controller => "users" work,  when I thing I created them in the same
manner.  Do you have any idea?  I expect there's not enough info to
let anyone to make a useful guess,  so I'll just keep working to
eliminate the need for routes to vendors and users,

Again, thanks for your insights,
Richard


On Mar 2, 8:38 am, Jeremy Chase <[email protected]> wrote:
> When mapping resources you use the pluralized version, so you need to switch
> it back to vendors. You also need to map the root, other wise
> localhost:3000/ will not have a route defined. See this commented line in
> routes.rb
>
>   # You can have the root of your site routed with map.root -- just remember
> to delete public/index.html.
>   # map.root :controller => "welcome"
>
> -Jer
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:30 AM, RichardOnRails <
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I ran:
> >    http://localhost:3000/
> > I got:
> >    Routing Error
> >    No route matches "/" with {:method=>:get}
>
> > I had just run:
> >    ruby script/generate scaffold vendor nickname:string
> > qbname:string
> >    rename public\index.html to --index.html
>
> > I listed Config\routes.rb:
> >    ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map|
> >       map.resources :vendors
>
> > I thought the plural "vendors" was odd, so I changed it to singular:
> > app ran fine.
>
> > Why did the plural version get generated? I'm running Rails 2.3.5 on
> > WinXP-Pro/SP3
>
> > Thanks in Advance
> > Richard
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<rubyonrails-talk%[email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to