Hi.

This must be the most obvious thing to do, but I just can't seem to
find examples of how to do this. I would like to create a table
with a
table unique constraint on database level.

In deed some migration code that would generate the following SQL

CREATE TABLE properties (
namespace CHAR(50),
name      CHAR(50),
value     VARCHAR(100),
CONSTRAINT my_constraint UNIQUE (namespace, name)
);


create_table :properties.....
 .....
end

add_index :properties, [:namespace, :name], :unique => true

After trying this and opening my interactive SQL prompt (psql), I can
see that this only creates an index on the table not a table
constraint. I can still put duplicate rows in the table.

Hrm.  I can't...  Rails 2.3.5, Postgresql 8.4.1 (on mac, but doubt
that matters)

I am so sorry. I did't do exactly as you said, explanation:
I used

create_table :properties do |t|
 .....
 t.index [:namespace, :name], :unique => true
end

That does NOT create an index!!! and therefore neither a constraint!!!

I gues that is a bug in the PostgreSQL adapter.

But when I do as you describe using add_index syntax instead it will
create an index (AND constraint!)

But the fact that 't.index [:namespace, :name], :unique => true' does
not generate an index is a bug, right?

Thanks for all help. I appreciate the time you've spent on this.

That does indeed look like a bug. I just tried it and it doesn't work. What's strange is the source code seems to say that "t.index" simply calls "add_index" just like if I'd done it normally.

I just tried it using MySQL as the backend and it does NOT work either.

+------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field      | Type         | Null | Key | Default | Extra          |
+------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id         | int(11)      | NO   | PRI | NULL    | auto_increment |
| a          | varchar(255) | YES  |     | NULL    |                |
| b          | varchar(255) | YES  |     | NULL    |                |
| created_at | datetime     | YES  |     | NULL    |                |
| updated_at | datetime     | YES  |     | NULL    |                |
+------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+

So, at least it's not a postgresql specific bug.

You should submit a ticket to the Rails folks...

-philip

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on 
Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to